Question:
Edgar Martinez a hall of famer?
?
2009-12-15 20:47:21 UTC
the dh of all time
Thirteen answers:
?
2009-12-16 00:14:40 UTC
**** you guys that say he doesn't deserve..he will go down at the best dh of all time..over .300 career hitter and over 300 homers.. he was an amazing hitter to watch..
The Mick 7
2009-12-16 14:18:08 UTC
Baseball is a game of offense and defense. It's a two dimensional game. Martinez might have been an excellent DH but he was an average fielder at best. As memory recalls, I don't think Martinez played the field in more that 500 or so games. Hardly a two dimensional player.



I am a baseball purest. I am not in favor of the DH nor am I a supporter of inner league play. Martinez was a very good hitter but that's all he was. I order to be considered for the hall of fame you not only have to be a good hitter, you have to excel in the field as well. There are far too many players now, in the hall of fame that don't belong. Adding Martinez to that list would just devalue the hall even more. No, he is not a hall of famer.
anonymous
2009-12-16 14:30:53 UTC
If Martinez gets into the hall of fame than guys like Don Mattingly should as well. Martinez couldn't play the field good enough to be in a daily lineup. Thank goodness for the DH or guys like him would never have been in the league long enough for this discussion.



Good hitter, lousy fielder! That's Martinez in a nutshell. The Hall of Fame is becoming a joke. There are so many players in the hall that don't belong there and some many great players that are not that should be!



Martinez shouldn't even be considered for the HOF. Once upon a time the HOF meant something. It was reserved for the truly greats of the game. Putting a so-so player like Martinez in the hall makes the hall cheap.
Robert Kuramoto
2009-12-16 11:16:22 UTC
This is a great question, I don't think to this date a DH has made it to the hall of fame. However Edgar is one of the best DH's to date (retired to date). I think he does deserve it, if he makes it this can pave the way for the big hurt and big popi.
nicedoc
2009-12-16 07:00:51 UTC
I'm of the mind that there are too many players in the "Hall of Fame." Over time, more and more marginal players have been getting in which erodes what should be an elite standard in order to get in.



Saying that, while a very good player, Edgar Martinez should not be in the Hall of Fame. However, he is a better player than many other hitters that are already in so I suppose he deserves to become one based on that.
Chipmaker Authentic
2009-12-16 00:36:02 UTC
He is to me.



Here's the review of Martinez' candidacy I blogged:





Edgar Martinez



Writers ballot rookie.



Career: 18 seasons, 1987-2004 -- all with the Seattle Mariners.



Peak season: 1995 -- 29 HR, 113 RBI, .356/.479/.628, 182 hits, 52 doubles, 121 runs, 185 OPS+, 161 RC, while playing the entire 145 game schedule.



Other outstanding seasons: 1990, 1991, 1992, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003.



Primary position: designated hitter; was a third baseman in his early seasons.



Honoraria and claims to fame: Seven All-Star selections (four starts), five AL Silver Sluggers (one for 3B, four for DH), two AL batting championships, led the AL in OBP three times, runs scored once, doubles twice, RBI once, runs created once. MLB's award for the season's outstanding designated hitter is named in Martinez's honor, after he won it five times.



Edgar Martinez could hit. Really HIT. The Mariners didn't call him up until he was 24, and didn't keep him up until he was 27, so his career totals never reached some of the sparkly milestones which he surely would have passed. That doesn't make him a lesser hitter, because he was amazing. Every season, Gar was either the best hitter on the team, or right behind Griffey or Rodriguez -- yes, he more than held his own against two men widely seen as inevitable future Hall Of Famers. In 1995, when Junior missed half the season, he kept the Mariners going, leading them to the franchise's first-ever postseason berth -- and it was Martinez who provided the signature moment against the Yankees in the ALDS, doubling in Griffey with the winning run in extra innings in Game 5. Yeah, Junior had the mile-wide smile at the bottom of the celebratory dogpile, but it was Martinez who brought him around.



In 1996, he was on a ferocious doubles pace -- 44 in 95 games -- when Piniella played him at third base, he collided with Marzano and got injured and missed a few weeks. And when he came back, he didn't have his power. I'm a hardliner on not giving credit for things not done, but I cannot help think about Martinez that season without the injury -- he projected to over 70 doubles, well past Webb's record, and if he had done it, his career would have one very shiny spangle to help boost his candidacy. And it's gonna be an uphill fight, because of The DH Thing.



I have no quibble with designated hitters, either the position as defined or the men who play it. It's been part of baseball for nearly 40 years; those who still think it somehow is wrong or is Not How The Game Should Be Played really need to get past their petty indignation. I take particular issue with anyone claiming that DHs play only half the game and therefore are unworthy of the Hall -- how do they approach AL starting pitchers, or any relief pitcher? Those are no different, from that point of view. I call hogwash. Martinez was a brilliant hitter, the Mariners decided that was his best destiny -- hey, better that than to let him play defense, especially if (a) there were better options and/or (b) he'd have been a liability with the glove. No, to me, he did the job that was asked of him, and he did so with greatness and beauty. It was a joy and a wonder to watch him bat.



Martinez could hit, he did hit a ton, and no one has ever done a better job of being a DH.

If the BBWAA is ever going to come to grips with the reality that is the designated hitter role, there is no better pioneer for opening the doors to the Hall as a DH than Edgar Martinez.



My vote: YES!



Prediction: 30%, as too many writers, including many who have never witnessed an AL game without the DH, hold to their unofficial pre-20th century precepts. I so hope I'm way wrong on this. The story of the 1990s Seattle Mariners' ascension to relevance is incomplete without Martinez in a starring role, and he's earned his plaque.
W #1
2009-12-15 21:23:50 UTC
Yes. He was the best DH and should go down as one of the best sluggers. He has done much for the history of the Seattle Mariners.
Michael
2009-12-16 06:26:38 UTC
nope a primary dh should never be allowed in all they have to do is focus on hitting. defense is a part of the game to. Now don't get me wrong he was a good player but prob won't get the desired number of votes in.
vX2fGgDJOu1RePOM2Psy6
2009-12-16 06:40:57 UTC
ABSOLUTELY... Edgar Martinez SHOULD and WILL be a hall of famer
ecwcal
2009-12-15 22:24:51 UTC
Nope.
el Águila
2009-12-15 20:52:24 UTC
I believe he is deserving, but will only get 35% this year.
jm
2009-12-15 21:25:05 UTC
Very close.
18 gibbs 20
2009-12-15 20:56:58 UTC
not to me


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...